By Jerry D. Rose

As Gainesville Florida approaches its ground zero day in the confrontation of Muslims and Christian fundamentalists, local people are on in a tizzy about what should be the reaction of its citizens who are of neither of these groups to the impending burning of copies of the Koran by the tiny (50 member) fundamentalist church, the Dove Outreach Center, on Saturday September 11.  When the impending event was first announced by Dove, the immediate reaction of the local liberal community was to plan to protest the event at the scene of its perpetration, and that approach is still being planned by some, including a group from Students for a Democratic Society at the University of Florida.

Soon after this knee-jerk reaction, second thoughts began to appear, in the perceived likelihood of violence ensuing between Dove demonstrators and the protesters.  Local peace groups and local ministers began instead to organize interfaith meetings of Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and others of all faiths and “no faith,” in a demonstration of community solidarity in the face of the breach in the harmony of a city notable for its appreciation of diversity: racially, religiously and in terms of sexual orientation (the city just elected its first openly gay mayor and has a number of elected and appointed black office-holders including a black Chief of Police.)

Both approaches—protest and prayer—have their place in social action, but also their limitations. Never a protester myself against the likes of the Viet Nam war, I was deeply skeptical of the effects on our decision-makers about the war when a group of students on my campus, the University of Wisconsin, massed to demonstrate against the war at the foot of the Lincoln statue on Bascombe Hill.  What was that going to accomplish? And so with the good-hearted and constructive efforts to promote interfaith or interracial understanding and tolerance.  It is one thing to sit in a seminar or prayer circle with people of other religions or races; it is a quite another to carry those kumbaya circles of solidarity into our everyday tendency to flock together with those of our own feathers with whom we have developed comfortable familiarity.  Whether the method is protest or prayer, my skepticism runs toward a feeling that such demonstrations of solidarity with minorities are basically opportunities for people to feel better about themselves for having “made the effort” during a special time of heightened awareness, rather than producing any long-term changes in the way people conduct their everyday lives.

But all that is sociological speculation, based hopefully on some careful observation of human behavior. In the current situation of the Koran-burning planned for Gainesville, protest and prayer can almost recede into a state of mutual irrelevance to the really consequential results of the impending burning.  My perspective is this: whether people protest, pray or (as some downstate Muslim parents told their UF children, just “leave town” for the weekend), the larger reality is that these events are a dire threat to the public’s safety, and that public officials should NEVER allow the burnings to occur at all. The Dove Center applied for a permit to hold the public burning and was denied the permit by the city; but said they would proceed with their plans without the permit.  In my mind that is a defiance of public authority and justifies the authorities in arresting the would-be perpetrators, holding them in “protective custody” for the weekend if not placing any charges against them.  I say this as a committed civil libertarian, but no proponent of freedom of speech and other forms of expression can correctly claim that these rights allow people seriously to threaten public safety.  It is easy to paint a lurid if all-too-accurate picture of the nature of this threat. A fundamental Christian church burns the most sacred book of 1.57 billion people in the world.  Violent protests of Muslims against impending action in Gainesville have already occurred in Indonesia and India.

Now the press of the world—not only the cameras of CNN and BBC but innumerable YouTubers with hand-held cameras, capture the images of the burning and broadcast them all over the world.  Perhaps the violent reaction doesn’t occur in Gainesville but in Amsterdam or Istanbul.  But even Gainesville itself will be extraordinarily vulnerable on this coming Saturday, when some 90,000 people will be massed in Ben Hill Griffin Stadium (a mile from where I live) for a U.F. football game.  The police are promising “checkpoint” control of traffic in the region of the Dove event, several miles away, but can they protect from the temptations of a suicide bomber to attack such a mass of “Christians” in one place?

Bottom line of this dire picture of the threats of the  Dove action to the people of Gainesville and the world: this is a totally plausible if nearly unthinkable result if these provocative acts are carried out.  No amount of protest and no amount of prayer are going to stop these consequences from being realized.  The police of Gainesville and the Sheriff of Alachua County must act pre-emptively to avert the provocative events from occurring. The failure to do will be a gross failure of law enforcement officials, but also of  elected political officials, from those of City Hall in Gainesville to those in the White House.  If there were anything resembling a “leader” as our President, that person would see THIS grave threat to the national security (much greater than some of those for which torture itself is deemed as “necessary” to avert) and would pick up the phone, dial Gainesville, speak directly to Mayor Craig Lowe, and urge him to do his duty to protect the public. Or have we yet another leader so removed from reality and concern for the people that he instead reads pet goat stories to school children as the country may well be going up in flames?

Share

  6 Responses to “CONFRONTING THE GAINESVILLE DOVE: PROTESTS, PRAYERS AND THE POLICE”

  1. You make an excellent point, the decision of the Dove Church to publicly stage a Koran burning is indeed an act which represents a real danger to the public, and not just to the immediate members of the church who choose to do the Koran burning.

    Of course, the singular aspect of the whole fiasco is the distinct nature of the offended community of Muslims, and the way they exhibit their displeasure. They get really violent!! Name another constituency, were their chosen document burned, that would react similarly.

    Imagine if the Dove Church chose to burn copies of “Going Rogue.” Would the Tea Partiers erupt in violent demonstrations? Nah, most of them would just laugh it off.

    Perhaps President Obama should visibly intervene. But imagine the discussions which must be going on in the political inner sanctum of the White House. Look, the massacre of 80,000 fans in Ben Hill Griffin Stadium would be awful to contemplate; but if Obama is seen as being responsible for quashing the Dove Church Koran burning, voters will REALLY think he’s a Muslim!!

  2. David –

    I think you’re selling the Tea Partiers short on whether they would riot if someone were to dare desecrate the Word of their personal Almighty.

    And only idiots would jump to the clearly nonsensical conclusion that Obama would “prove” he is a Muslim by publicly condemning a hateful, violent and illegal protest. Mitt Romney (to his credit) spoke out harshly against Dove and their 9/11 event. Does that make Mitt a follower of Islam? You decide…

  3. “Paul”-

    Not surprised you can’t grasp the point about the White House dilemna about whether and how to intervene in the Hope Church Koran-a-pallooza.

    See, its one thing that some segment of the U.S. population “thinks Obama is a Muslim.”

    What’s funny is Team Obama (and the sympathetic mainstream press) engaging in such obvious hand-wringing about how awful it is that some segment of the U.S. population “thinks Obama is a Muslim.”

    What’s the big deal? I thought Muslims were peaceful, intelligent, tolerant, science-forward thinkers!

    Hope this helps!

  4. “David Wells” –

    So you’re actually saying that Obama or his admin attempting to intervene in the “Burn a Koran” hate-fest would “prove” that he is Muslim? You believe that no other American president would carry out their sworn oath to defend and protect the United States when scumbags like your pastor friend so clearly threaten not only the lives of American soldiers, but potentially citizens here at home?

  5. “Paul”-

    I’m not saying that at all. You might want to read what I posted.

    I have no opinion about whether Obama is a Muslim or not. In fact, he spent 20 years reverently following Spiritual Advisor Jeremiah Wright’s rantings in the Unity Church in Chicago, so he must technically be a Christian!

    And I have no idea what any other American President would do, if the wacky Hope Pastor Terry Jones were to threaten to stage a Koran Barbeque on their watch.

    I’m simply speculating about one specific and distinctively odd behavior of the Keepers Of The Obama Brand, which is their frantic and hyper-defensive insistance that “He is NOT a Muslim!–Not That There Is Anything Wrong With That!!”

  6. Well, this ignorant hillbilly managed to make a name for himself. Too bad the media was so accommodating in that regard.

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

   
© 2013 Principled Progressive Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha